Slava Novorossiya

Slava Novorossiya

Thursday, July 5, 2012

My response to ‘We must not let Ian Brady starve himself: his life is not ours to take’


I read with interest in The Telegraph.co.uk in an article on Thursday 5 July 2012: ‘We must not let Ian Brady starve himself: his life is not ours to take’ by Cristina Odone and I would like to comment on many points I disagree with her.

If Ian Brady were in America, he'd have been dead years ago. He and his partner in crime, Myra Hindley, would have been strapped to the electric chair soon after they were tried and found guilty of torturing, abusing and killing the children they'd abducted. Death Row is choc-a-bloc with psychopaths like the Moors murderers, and American justice deals with them in a straightforward, Old Testament way: an eye for an eye, a life for a life.

Response: If the both of them were executed long ago, we can put the whole matter behind instead of having awarding them an advantage of life over death on their victims. American justice does not only follow the OT but also the New Testament, there are several verses in the bible that permits capital punishment.

Ours is an infinitely more complex, and more humane, justice system. It is based on the possibility of redemption, not just retribution. It supports a view of life as God-given, not man-made.

Response: A more humane justice system? Ever since the death penalty was abolished in the 1960s, the homicide rates have more than doubled. It is based on the possibility of redemption, not just retribution? As a former opponent of the death penalty, I now support the death penalty because I empathized and sympathize with the grieving victims’ families and I also want to protect my country like the armed forces (Hear what Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr, SirJames Fitzjames Stephen, Alex Kozinski and Chalerm Ubumrung have to say). It is not about revenge but justice. It supports a view of life as God-given, not man-made, Please see the response to Werner Herzog
 
But it does mean that Brady is still around, to haunt and taunt the survivors from his psychiatric prison cell in Ashworth, Liverpool. Now he wants to starve himself to death. We must not let him.  To do so would mean, in effect, embracing capital punishment. It would set off a chain reaction of legal cases that would allow for assisted suicide (not only for prisoners but for others), and ultimately restore the death penalty in this country.

Response: The most conclusive evidence that criminals fear the death penalty more than life without parole is provided by convicted capital murderers and their attorneys. 99.9% of all convicted capital murderers and their attorneys argue for life, not death, in the punishment phase of their trial. When the death penalty becomes real, murderers fear it the most.
I suspect that one of the reason why Ian Brady is behaving like that is that he just wants attention from the media, he has not even show any remorse for his crimes at all. Winnie, the mother of Keith Bennett once said, “Monsters like Brady and now this sick Steve Wright creature do not deserve life, or our pity. We should stop thinking about what’s best for people who murder our women and children. They’ll never change however long they are caged.”
 
I knew Frank Longford, the great penal reformer, and am proud to be part of the Longford Trust that campaigns in his memory for redemptive as well as retributive justice. Despite my fondness for him, I can't say that I ever bought his passionate defense of Myra Hindley as repented sinner (a defense that earned him the ire of millions and the mockery of the media).  But I know that I'd rather be Loony Longford than an American barbarian.

Response: You should show compassion on those children and their grieving families that the moors murderers did to them. American barbarian? No way, the real barbarians are the European Court of Human Rights who are the friends of criminals. Just take a look at what they did to Jamie Bulger and at the same time look at the justice system in Dubai.

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

THE DEATH PENALTY DEBATE: BUDDHISM


There is disagreement among Buddhists as to whether or not Buddhism forbids the death penalty. The first of the Five Precepts (Panca-sila) is to abstain from destruction of life. Chapter 10 of the Dhammapada states:

Everyone fears punishment; everyone fears death, just as you do. Therefore do not kill or cause to kill. Everyone fears punishment; everyone loves life, as you do. Therefore do not kill or cause to kill.

Chapter 26, the final chapter of the Dhammapada, states, "Him I call a brahmin who has put aside weapons and renounced violence toward all creatures. He neither kills nor helps others to kill." These sentences are interpreted by many Buddhists (especially in the modern humanistic West) as an injunction against supporting any legal measure which might lead to the death penalty. However, as is often the case with the interpretation of scripture, there is dispute on this matter. Historically, most states where the official religion is Buddhism have imposed capital punishment for some offenses. One notable exception is the abolition of the death penalty by the Emperor Saga of Japan in 818. This lasted until 1165, although in private manors executions continued to be conducted as a form of retaliation. Japan still imposes the death penalty, although some recent justice ministers have refused to sign death warrants, citing their Buddhist beliefs as their reason. Other Buddhist-majority states vary in their policy. For example, Bhutan has abolished the death penalty, but Thailand still retains it, although Buddhism is the official religion in both.

The Buddhist concept of lethal self-defense is subtly non-linear and based on the criterion of prevention of greater suffering. The Bodhicaryavatara of Shantideva (8th century AD), authorizes violence if it is necessary to prevent suffering: "One should always strive for the benefit of others. Even that which has been prohibited has been permitted for the compassionate one who foresees benefit"; "May I be a protector for those who do not have protectors"; and "If the suffering of many disappears because of the suffering of one, then a compassionate person should induce that suffering for the sake of others." Upaya-kaushalya sutra (Skillful Means) tells the story of a Bodhisattva who saved hundreds of people by killing a murderous thief. Other Mahayana scriptures explain that such a defensive killing prevents the murderer from bringing more bad karma on himself, and creates good karma for the defender, providing that the defender acts in the spirit of compassion. This is known in Japanese Buddhist tradition as issatsu tasho, "killing one (aggressor) in order that many (innocents) may live" and is a manifestation of "skillful means". Nor should it be forgotten that, in considering the non-linear attitude of Buddhism towards "chivalrous" violence, the blue-eyed great Buddha Bodhidharma, not only brought Zen Buddhism from India to China around 520 A.D., but was also, according to universal tradition, the founder of the martial arts and kung fu. In mystical Zen Buddhism (as reflected in Japanese Bushido), there is a traditional expression: "the sword that (justly) kills is the identical with the sword that gives life".

Therefore, few (if any) Buddhist groups issue blanket decrees against Buddhists being soldiers, police officers, or farmers (which in Buddhism is classified as a profession involved in destruction of life), and some argue that the death penalty is permissible if it is used for preventative purposes. In general, Buddhist groups in secular countries such as Japan, Korea, and Taiwan tend to take an anti-death penalty stance, while in Thailand, Sri Lanka, and Bhutan, where Buddhism has strong political influence, the opposite is true. Almost all Buddhist groups, however, oppose the use of the death penalty as a means of retribution.


Buddhism and capital punishment


Because Buddhism exists in many forms, under many organisations, there is no unified Buddhist policy on capital punishment. In terms of doctrine the death penalty is clearly inconsistent with Buddhist teaching. Buddhists place great emphasis on non-violence and compassion for all life. The First Precept requires individuals to abstain from injuring or killing any living creature.

The Buddha did not explicitly speak about capital punishment, but his teachings show no sympathy for physical punishment, no matter how bad the crime. An action, even if it brings benefit to oneself, cannot be considered a good action if it causes physical and mental pain to another being. If a person foolishly does me wrong, I will return to him the protection of my boundless love. The more evil that comes from him, the more good will go from me.

Anti-Death Penalty Quotes:

Within Buddhism, there are ten fundamental precepts, and the first precept is “I am reverential and mindful of all life. I am not violent. I do not kill.” And that pretty well sums it up.  - Kabutsu Shindo, Rinzai Zen Buddhist Priest





















I believe that as long as one is alive there is the possibility to change and redress whatever wrong one has done. -- His Holiness Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama, Spiritual Leader of Tibet

My overriding belief is that it is always possible for criminals to improve and that by its very finality the death penalty contradicts this. Therefore, I support those organizations and individuals who are trying to bring an end to the use of the death penalty. -- His Holiness Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama, Spiritual Leader of Tibet

As a Buddhist monk I am completely against any form of violence, particularly the killing of the other sentient beings. And in the case of the death penalty we are actually faced with killing that is decided and carried out by a country's justice system. I think this quite immoral and wrong. -- His Holiness Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama, Spiritual Leader of Tibet

Criminals, people who commit crimes, usually society rejects these people. They are also part of society. Give them some form of punishment to say they were wrong, but show them they are part of society and can change. Show them compassion. -- His Holiness Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama, Spiritual Leader of Tibet




















I oppose the death penalty as I oppose all murder, as I oppose the imposition of suffering on all beings through the action of the individual, group, or state. My opposition is based on simply my own choice. It does not rely on any scriptural command of my tradition, any dogma, any external coercion or any commandment from above. My opposition is my responsibility, it is my? ability-to-respond.? Who I am is who I choose to be, consciously and deliberately -- I am not who I am told to be. I choose for myself to adhere the First Precept of Buddhism that goes something like this:? I am reverential and mindful of all life, I am not violent and I do not kill? - Venerable Kobutsu Malone, zenji - American Rinzai Zen Buddhist priest, volunteer death row chaplain and social justice activist.

Pro Death Penalty Quotes:





















Hsing Yun (Chinese: 星雲大師; pinyin: Xīngyún Dàshī; born August 30, 1927) is a Chinese Buddhist monk and the founder founder of the Fo Guang Shan Buddhist order and the affiliated Buddha's Light International Association, one of the largest international Buddhist organizations in Taiwan and in the Buddhist world.

A Buddhist monk, Hsing Yun claimed that the abolishment of capital punishment is not valid by the laws of karma and vipāka in Buddhism. He has written, "However, although "severe punishments in chaotic time (亂世用重典)" do not necessarily have effects in stopping crimes, abolishing capital punishment is not valid by the laws of karma and vipāka in Buddhism, because "a karma as such induces a vipāka as such (如是因,招感如是果)"; having committed a karma without experiencing the vipāka is not compatible with reason. Hence, we can wish to reduce the capital punishment, not to recur to the capital punishment, to substitute the capital punishment by other measures, but we do not claim for the abolishment of the capital punishment."














Phra Kru Non Thawat is the head monk of Lap Lae temple, which is just on the other side of the wall from the execution chamber of Bang Kwang Prison. He has given the last rites to every prisoner executed at Bang Kwan.

The prison’s resident Buddhist monk – like the majority of Thai people – has little sympathy for drug traffickers: “Drug dealing is a type of mass murder - it can destroy whole families. If a child becomes addicted to drugs, he drags down his whole family with him. The child starts to steal everything, which ruins the family’s reputation in society. A murderer typically kills only one person. Drug dealers don’t kill just one person - they ruin everyone’s lives.” [Quoted in THE REAL BANGKOK HILTON BBC Documentary 22 July 2004]

Thailand is a Buddhist country so people are always questioning why executions are allowed here. Yes, killing is sinful but Buddhism teaches us to look at the intention behind the act. The intention here is to protect the country, so it is permitted. Since the Sukhothai dynasty, the King has gone out to fight wars. He and his troops have had to kill enemies to protect the country - execution is the same. [Quoted in THE REAL BANGKOK HILTON BBC Documentary 22 July 2004]

Sunday, July 1, 2012

PRO DEATH PENALTY QUOTE OF THE WEEK [SUNDAY 1 JULY 2012 TO SATURDAY 7 JULY 2012]





















QUOTE: Wilful murderers must be put to death. This is the sin which is here designed to be restrained by the terror of punishment (1.) God will punish murderers: At the hand of every man's brother will I require the life of man, that is, "I will avenge the blood of the murdered upon the murderer." 2 Chronicles 24:22. When God requires the life of a man at the hand of him that took it away unjustly, the murderer cannot render that, and therefore must render his own in lieu of it, which is the only way left of making restitution. Note, The righteous God will certainly make inquisition for blood, though men cannot or do not. One time or other, in this world or in the next, he will both discover concealed murders, which are hidden from man's eye, and punish avowed and justified murders, which are too great for man's hand. (2.) The magistrate must punish murderers (Genesis 9:6): Whoso sheddeth man's blood, whether upon a sudden provocation or having premeditated it (for rash anger is heart-murder as well as malice prepense, Matthew 5:21,22), by man shall his blood be shed, that is, by the magistrate, or whoever is appointed or allowed to be the avenger of blood. There are those who are ministers of God for this purpose, to be a protection to the innocent, by being a terror to the malicious and evildoers, and they must not bear the sword in vain, Romans 13:4. Before the flood, as it should seem by the story of Cain, God took the punishment of murder into his own hands; but now he committed this judgment to men, to masters of families at first, and afterwards to the heads of countries, who ought to be faithful to the trust reposed in them. Note, Wilful murder ought always to be punished with death. It is a sin which the Lord would not pardon in a prince (2 Kings 24:3,4), and which therefore a prince should not pardon in a subject. To this law there is a reason annexed: For in the image of God made he man at first. Man is a creature dear to his Creator, and therefore ought to be so to us. God put honour upon him, let not us then put contempt upon him. Such remains of God's image are still even upon fallen man as that he who unjustly kills a man defaces the image of God and does dishonour to him. When God allowed men to kill their beasts, yet he forbade them to kill their slaves; for these are of a much more noble and excellent nature, not only God's creatures, but his image, James 3:9. All men have something of the image of God upon them; but magistrates have, besides, the image of his power, and the saints the image of his holiness, and therefore those who shed the blood of princes or saints incur a double guilt. [Matthew Henry’s commentary on Genesis 9 verse 6]

AUTHOR: Matthew Henry (18 October 1662 – 22 June 1714) was an English commentator on the Bible and Presbyterian minister. He was born at Broad Oak,a farmhouse on the borders of Flintshire and Shropshire. His father, Philip Henry, had just been ejected under the Act of Uniformity 1662. Unlike most of his fellow-sufferers, Philip possessed some private means, and was thus able to give his son a good education. Matthew went first to a school at Islington, and then to Gray's Inn. He soon gave up his legal studies for theology, and in 1687 became minister of a Presbyterian congregation at Chester. He moved again in 1712 to Mare Street, Hackney. Two years later (22 June 1714), he died suddenly of apoplexy at the Queen's Aid House (41 High Street) in Nantwich while on a journey from Chester to London.  

PRO LIFE QUOTE OF THE WEEK [SUNDAY 1 JULY 2012 TO SATURDAY 7 JULY 2012]






















QUOTE: I think a noble goal for this country is that every child, born and unborn, ought to be protected in law and welcomed into life. [U.S. Presidential debate in Boston (October 1, 2000)]

AUTHOR: George Walker Bush (born July 6, 1946) is an American politician and businessman who was the 43rd President of the United States from 2001 to 2009 and the 46th Governor of Texas from 1995 to 2000. The eldest son of Barbara Bush and George H. W. Bush, he was born in New Haven, Connecticut. After graduating from Yale University in 1968 and Harvard Business School in 1975, Bush worked in oil businesses. He married Laura Welch in 1977 and ran unsuccessfully for the House of Representatives shortly thereafter. He later co-owned the Texas Rangers baseball team before defeating Ann Richards in the 1994 Texas gubernatorial election. In a close and controversial election, Bush was elected president in 2000, becoming the fourth president to be elected despite receiving less popular votes nationwide than his opponent. Bush is the second president to have been the son of a former president. He is also the brother of Jeb Bush, former Governor of Florida.